<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IEEE 1149.7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dftdigest.com/blog-posts/ieee-11497/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dftdigest.com/blog-posts/ieee-11497/</link>
	<description>Expanding design-for-test in an ever-shring world...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:06:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guru</title>
		<link>http://www.dftdigest.com/blog-posts/ieee-11497/comment-page-1/#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dftdigest.com/?p=782#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

I was searching for information on 1149.7 standard and found in your site and interesting. I am looking for how to write TAP controller for 1149.7. No proper material is available neither in IEEE site nor in public domain.

You have done good job by including this article and really helped lot to understand the standard.

Could you please put one more article on TAP controller designing for 1149.7? It will help many to understand better.

Thanks in advance

-Guru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I was searching for information on 1149.7 standard and found in your site and interesting. I am looking for how to write TAP controller for 1149.7. No proper material is available neither in IEEE site nor in public domain.</p>
<p>You have done good job by including this article and really helped lot to understand the standard.</p>
<p>Could you please put one more article on TAP controller designing for 1149.7? It will help many to understand better.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
<p>-Guru</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.dftdigest.com/blog-posts/ieee-11497/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dftdigest.com/?p=782#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric!

Thanks for the comment - Yeah, it&#039;s kind of frustrating not to be able to get the standards info - not very transparent, I&#039;d say.

There have been a couple of other companies announcing their contributions to the standard since I posted this (Corelis is one I just saw yesterday or today).  Just this morning, I ran into an announcement for a webinar from IP-extreme taking place next week, that will go over the standard (and plug their cJTAG IP, no doubt).

Here&#039;s the link: http://www.ip-extreme.com/webinars/

Cheers,
JMF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment &#8211; Yeah, it&#8217;s kind of frustrating not to be able to get the standards info &#8211; not very transparent, I&#8217;d say.</p>
<p>There have been a couple of other companies announcing their contributions to the standard since I posted this (Corelis is one I just saw yesterday or today).  Just this morning, I ran into an announcement for a webinar from IP-extreme taking place next week, that will go over the standard (and plug their cJTAG IP, no doubt).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link: <a href="http://www.ip-extreme.com/webinars/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ip-extreme.com/webinars/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
JMF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric West</title>
		<link>http://www.dftdigest.com/blog-posts/ieee-11497/comment-page-1/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dftdigest.com/?p=782#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

I was looking into 1149.7 and I stumbled across your web site.  I wasn&#039;t going to
leave a comment, but when I noticed it was you writing it, I thought I would concur
with what your are saying.  There is nothing I can find from IEEE about this standard.
There certainly is demand for it, but there are no preliminary specs I can find.
Must be a conspiracy...

-Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I was looking into 1149.7 and I stumbled across your web site.  I wasn&#8217;t going to<br />
leave a comment, but when I noticed it was you writing it, I thought I would concur<br />
with what your are saying.  There is nothing I can find from IEEE about this standard.<br />
There certainly is demand for it, but there are no preliminary specs I can find.<br />
Must be a conspiracy&#8230;</p>
<p>-Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
